Coffee and L2.0 on Saturday, anyone?

Uncategorized

Like to meet up for a coffee and a chat about Library2.0? A group of us are meeting this Saturday (2 June) at 3pm at the X-Wray cafe opposite the Luna on Essex Cinema (3-13 Essex Streeet) in Fremantle. Library worker or library curious folk are welcome.

Hoi (e-Services Librarian at Victoria Park Library), Constance and I were meant to be chatting about the WA Library Unconference in the unconference meebo chat room tonight, but we strayed off topic and kind of didn’t get back on again. A face to face cuppa in the sun to talk about anything and everything Library2.0 sounded good to us, so we thought we’d organise one.

Feel free to just turn up. If you can’t make it but would like to know if we’ll be meeting again, please email me.

Tagged Randomness

Uncategorized

Ryan just tagged me for the 8 random things meme, and Constance-who-is-sometimes- known-as-CW challenged me ages ago to name 5 blogs that make me think, plus asked on Tuesday “what are your goals?”.

I thought I’d just mash ’em up into one post…but it became too long, so instead I’m trickling them out on time delay over the next few days…

Random thing 1.

Tonight I found a teeny tiny brindle staffy pup walking into the traffic near my driveway. I scooped her into a blanket and wandered my neighbourhood asking whether anyone had lost her. Ended up taking her to the local vet to spend the night there before she is taken to the pound.

[…to be continued…]

Practice to Presentation seminar at University of Western Australia

Uncategorized

I told twitter I was going to this seminar, and twitter asked me to blog it. Here’s my rough notes prettied up a bit.

Carol Newton-Smith ably chaired the session and between speakers had us do one activity:

  1. Write down a presentation idea
  2. Chat with the person next to you about the idea
  3. Go forth and do a literature search
  4. This created 30 potential conference papers in the audience

Carmel O’Sullivan: Law librarian, Edith Cowan University

Started with anecdote about her first presentation where she knew her topic very well, but discovered she didn’t really know where the knowledge gaps were in the profession. It was an opportunity for self-reflection as she did everything that you classically shouldn’t do – read the paper, spoke to fast…

Outlined 5 tips:

  1. Have something to say. Read widely and know where the gaps are in the professional literature.
  2. Be self reflexive. Analyse your mistakes, learn from them and try again
  3. Find reasons to write professionally – practice your writing with journal aricles, etc..it’s very easy to get published, just do it.
  4. Rig what you do in your practice so that it can be written up later
  5. Gain skills in speaking well. Apply adult learning principles. If you are desperately nervous, robotically following the principles of good presentation (speak slowly, engage your audience, don’t read the entire paper word for word…etc) works well.

She used to have her talk written out completely, then just pared it down to the main points. She memorises her closing sentence so she finishes strongly.

QUESTION FROM AUDIENCE : If you have submitted a written paper serveral months before, how much of it should you cover in your presentation?

ANSWERS Paper usually is 5000 words or so, only have chance to say about 3000. OK to just pare it down and say “paper covers 5 points, I’ll just talk about 3”. What can you offer to people by being in the room with them that your written paper didn’t offer?

Paul Genoni , Curtin University

Has given 45 papers and sat through about 1600 others. Sees a good presentation as an art, not a science.

Eight tips

  1. It’s OK to commence your paper with an anecdote. (He began with one about Bernard, a very experienced law librarian who sat in the front row of Paul’s first presentation and then fell asleep. A couple of weeks later, Paul discovered that Bernard had died at work of a heart attack).
  2. In every audience there is going to be somebody who is going to be the next to die. (Is your paper worth them exchanging some of their last hours for?)
  3. Content is everything. Your abstract is a contract with your audience. Give them what you told them they’d hear. If you do a “how we done it good” paper, ensure you broaden the application of what you did so that it is relevant to the audience. You want them to go home with 2-3 points. Less is more – don’t cram everything you know into the presentation
  4. Timing is everything. You lose your audience if you go overtime. Plan for 18 minutes if it is a 20 minute presentation
  5. Presentation is everything. Your presentation should fit your personality and not feel fake to the audience.
  6. Preparation is more than everything. You can control content, timing and presentation and good preparation ensures you do. Try sitting in the audience of the room where you will speak.
  7. No-one in the audience knows or cares how you feel. If you feel super-confident, don’t digress because you think you can take the audience with you. If you feel like you are dying on stage, don’t digress to try to win the audience back.
  8. One person in every audience will fall asleep. Your obligation is to those who are still listening.

Liz Burke, University of Western Australia

Do lots of professional writing. Think about writing for scholarly journals. Practice having something to say

Often we don’t write up what we are doing professionally, then go to a conference and are surprised that something being lauded as innovative is the same thing we’ve been doing for years.

Have a network of trusted professional colleagues to bounce ideas off.

Connected Ventures “Flagpole Sitta” viral clip on Vimeo

Uncategorized

Bronwen mentioned this video on twitter maybe a month ago.

Lip Dub – Flagpole Sitta by Harvey Danger from amandalynferri on Vimeo

We did this video one night after work. We are a company called Connected Ventures, a group of friends who work for: Vimeo, CollegeHumor, Busted Tees, and Defunker.

This is posted on the Vimeo video sharing site, which I hadn’t heard of until – you guessed it – I was pointed to this cool and entertaining video.

What do I think of it?

  1. I feel much older, less creative and fatter.
  2. It perked me up.
  3. Millenial geeks are cute.
  4. If they can produce something like this with equipment I have lying around my house, how can movie makers and mainstream media hope to impress this generation?
  5. I hope that it is, as I suspect, just a viral video produced by Connected Ventures to promote Vimeo, or else that the kids were paid heavy bonuses for the traffic it brings to the site.
  6. I hope that they were also paid bonuses by Busted Tees, another company they work for and whose product many of them are wearing.
  7. Oohhh look…what does Defunker do…?
  8. Hmmmmm…. game set and match to clever marketers.

What if we hired some millennial geeks to weave through our library services, lips syncing and looking cute. Could we go viral?

Second Life Workshops in an Academic Library or “Fluffy librarianship”.

Uncategorized

I’ve been doing a lot of work with Second Life recently and wonder if I’m hanging out at the fluffy end of librarianship.

While my colleagues in our uni library are finding the best electronic resources to meet scholars’ needs, I’m giving 8 workshops in the next 2 months for the uni community in “Creating your avatar” and “Doing more with your avatar”. In my classes in a library PC lab, people are giving themselves silly names, bouncing on virtual trampolines, changing their clothes in front of their classmates, banging into walls and laughing a lot. If you want to see what we’ve been doing, here’s the course outline, murdochsecondlife .

tramp2.jpg

My interest in Second Life began as an extension of an earlier Sims 2 addiction and a curiousity about how you would “do” a library there. I saw it as a geeky playtime, much the same way as Andrew Finegan makes great clips about libraries on YouTube in his spare time. Bit of fun.

Yesterday I had an extremely exciting invitation to fly to the other side of Australia to do some professional development with public librarians, all about Second Life. (I should be cool and pretend it happens every day). I love showing people Second Life for the first time and explaining to them how libraries are using it – people get very engaged and have that “wow” look on their faces. (Well, some have a “OMG that’s a load of crap” and others a “I feel motion sick” look).

I guess, I’m becoming known as “that librarian who knows about Second Life”…not sure that’s who I want to be. And my Second Life stuff is taking me away from the serious, grown-up edge of librarianship, like finding out more about open source library management software.

Ord Canning, a library avatar

I do think Second Life will have applications in education and for libraries, if it can just iron out that “have to have an expensive computer and huge amounts of bandwidth” glitch. And people continue to think that it’s OK for each avatar to take up as much energy as a real person in Brazil. With faster and cheaper computers it is possible that access to SL may become more equitable and less costly.

Behind the fluffiness of my workshops lies a point. I think online virtual worlds require a new literacy that you can only learn hands on. The Horizon Report 2007 identifies virtual worlds as one of six major trends in emerging technology that will impact on higher education, so I think our academics and students need to be able to evaluate this tool. Half the workshops were full the day the notice was emailed out, and they are now booked out, so there is certainly great interest.

I still feel like I’m maybe having too much fun…I’ll get over it…..

LINTerviews are fun

Uncategorized

I’ve been hoisted by my own petard.

Laurie the Librarian, asked me to do a “pick five questions from the list” interview for her blog. If you want to know how I answered the following questions, pop over to her blog and read Featured Visitor: Kathryn. :

  • Why did you choose library and information science as your profession?
  • Why do you read blogs?
  • What do you see as the core business of libraries?
  • What do you think is the most important issues affecting librarians today?
  • What is your pet peeve about the blogosphere?

Laurie was inspired by the LINTerview series we are running on librariesinteract.info . I love these, partly because how we did it was typical of the laconic teamwork we’ve evolved.

“Hey, Peta and I were talking in the car and we thought…But we could make this change…Yeah OK…I’ve added some questions…Here’s some more…I’ve put it on the wiki…How about we ask…..I’ve asked so-and-so….Done!”

I also like being able to ask nosy questions of people I admire and find interesting. So far we’ve only had one person decline. I think I’ll try to send out another batch tonight, as I’ve been fascinated already by:

After answering Laurie’s questions, I understand how hard it is to be clear and casual and sound like yourself and say interesting things and not bore yourself silly.

If there’s someone you’d like to see LINTerviewed, drop a comment on this post or email: librarian at librariesinteract dot info. (Add the relevant punctuation.)

Barcamp and Unconference in Perth

Uncategorized

Pencils out, diaries out – two events I plan to attend.

Yesterday I registered for Perth Barcamp. on 30th June. The Perth Library Unconference is tentatively set for 3 August from lunchtime to after dinner time.

PERTH BARCAMP

Where: Central TAFE, 140 Royal St, East Perth WA 6004
When: Saturday 30th June 2007 9am-5pm
Cost: TBA (Probably around $10)
Registration here.

PERTH LIBRARY UNCONFERENCE
(All To be confirmed)
Where: State Library of Western Australia
When: Friday 3rd August 2007 12 noon – after dinner
Cost: TBA

Barcamps are unconference kinds of gatherings that presume “whoever turns up is the right person, whatever we discuss is the right thing”. It was initially a response to “FooCamp“, which is an annual invitation-only event run by O’Reilly Media (the guys who publish those computing books with etchings of animals on them).

It tends to have a techie focus, but if everyone wanted to talk about Championship Farnarkling instead then we could. I’d love to have a posse of librarians there to talk about the techie end of what we are doing in Western Australia. ..or just to learn from the other participants.

Many of the people who will be at Perth Barcamp will be the same mob who go to the monthly Perth Weblogger meetups. I went to the May meetup on Wednesday night. About a third of us were women, and the conversation – while with a techie focus – was much more “let’s all be involved and share” than “I’m going to discuss esoteric computing things with strange initials just to exclude you lesser mortals”.

There were three librarians at the meetup – me, CW and Matthais. I enjoyed discussing more than just “Library2.0 Lite”. I’m interested in widgets dammit! I think we formed the Western Australian Chapter of the Library Society of the World while we were chatting.

There may be fewer posts from me in the next couple of weeks. I’m away for the weekend on a respite camp for mums of kids with disabilities, then need to sit down for a few weeks and do a few life-based things that don’t involve blogging. The theme of the camp is Rome, so I need an outfit for Saturday dinner. Am I going as Sophia Loren or a Venus?…oh no….I’m going for a look much more like this:

Saredgna – Laconi – widow Uploaded to Flickr on April 27, 2006 by CharlesFred

Dreaming on…library developers…

Uncategorized

As I’ve said before, I wish my library had the funds for a coding wizard who was given time to work on new projects to enhance our library systems,Grow your own OPAC…but save those kittens. I think a position like this would be useful to:

  1. get our systems talking better to each other
  2. reduce the number of places our clients need to go, or steps they need to do, on our websites.
  3. advise us of cheaper, easier, software or enhancements to current software.
  4. Show librarians like electronic services librarians, web librarians, emerging technology librarians and immersive technology librarians, how to do some of what we do better.

I also think that, like most libraries, we are stretched for funds and at this stage a library developer would be on a “dream on” list.

But….dreaming on…here’s an example of how just a couple of lines of javascript on the footer of a record display template can value add enormously. When I compare the cost to hire someone to do this, as opposed to the huge purchase costs of an off the shelf module, I begin to wonder about whether I should be quite so quick to dismiss a library developer as a luxury. (Lest I sound too optomistic, I do realise that their are issues like maintenance and LibraryThing’s business model to consider)

Danbury Library has added data from LibraryThing to its III catalogue, Danbury, CT kicks off LibraryThing for Libraries!

Their records now include a list of “other editions” plus “translations and similar books”. You can click on a tag and see what else in the library has the same tag. It harvests the data from LibraryThing – using information from thousands of LibraryThing users who have used it to catalogue their home collections in plain English, not from cataloguers.

In their record for Jane Eyre, (image below), the last three fields are generated from LibraryThing’s data.

danburyeyre.jpg

I tried it this morning and the tag browser was too slow to be useful, but the “other editions” and “similar books” looked fantastic.

It’s not perfect, it is developmental and it is FREE. Here’s some more information about the project from the Thingology post.

How it works. Perhaps the most remarkable thing here is the relative ease with which Danbury added the feature. Danbury has an Innovative Interfaces OPAC (“WebPac”), but LibraryThing for Libraries is platform agnositic. There is no back-end integration–no one at Danbury had to call their vendor. Ultimately, it involved just a few lines of JavaScript pasted into the page footer. It works on any modern browser. It causes your tea service to fill with magical gold. Okay, not that.

Caveats.

Some things we’re working on:

  • So far, it only knows ISBN books.
  • The Tag Browser is not fast enough. This can be improved, no question.
  • There are some wrinkles in the tag data, particularly in marginal cases. Some of this will go away, but not all of it.
  • There are some character problems, like the tag “C++” turning into “C.”
  • In the rush to get the feature out, we forgot to give Danbury the “noscript” tag, so that users with JavaScript turned off can enjoy the enhanced content.

Improvements:

  • We wanted to start with non-interactive features. We love user tagging, but wanted to show what out existing data could do without any additional patron data. There are also sticky privacy issues there. But, of course, this is a direction we’ll be moving in.

The Future. Getting one library out takes a lot of pressure off us. We’ve been doing a lot of custom work to show potential customers what we’re going to offer. With a major test case live, we can cut back on that. We’ve also learned a lot more about the problems of importing library data, and are making progress there. We’ll moving into “production” mode, and getting back to other libraries soon.

Im in ur sociation takin ova the library world

Uncategorized

If you recognize the leetspeak of the title, then you know about I can has cheezburger? – an anarchic site that captions photos – mainly of cats, but sometimes of walruses, gerbils and invisible things. It’s not all fluffy bunny, sometimes they are in very adult situations.

Twice a year or so, I read something so funny that tears roll down my cheeks, I have an asthma attack and giggles bubble out for the next couple of hours. This was one.

It’s got me thinking about the informality, injokes and creativity I’ve seen online in the last couple of weeks. For me, it’s moving away from blogging, reading blogs and commenting on blogs and into more synchronious collaboration, read/write and re-mixing. If what the young kids have been doing is reaching the olds like me, I wonder what the young’uns are doing now?

The main place I’ve been hanging out is still twitter. I think it’s beginning to get a bit quieter but at its peak, links and lives were flying backward and forward at a very fast pace, and just as the Perth blogging contingent would begin going to bed, the US biblioblabbers would be most lively.

Lolbrarians was a link thrown out by Steve Lawson to twitter that sent everyone off to look at the lolibrarians site, comment and then create their own post. As a mix of erudition and junk culture it is only second to the Shakespeare lolcats.

The Library Society of the World is the best, most efficient, egalitarian and effective alternative to any library association ever. Why? Because we say it is and we are not taking it seriously. After the ALA election results were announced there was the usual malcontent expressed via twitter by people who would love to make a difference but don’t have time…why can’t things be different?, can’t we have another association? Yada yada.

So Joshua Neff put up the wiki. Heaps of people have joined and chosen our positions (I’m Antipodean Antibibliorthodoxist). During the brief blip of collaboration, here’s the policies that were nutted out:

  • No Parliamentary Procedure
  • No one chairs meetings; no one motions; no one seconds. Just change things and see how the rest of us respond.
  • No Elections – Just give yourself a title and we’ll accept you!
  • No Budget Process – If you give someone a donation, they are going to keep it and spend it how they like.
  • No Unnecessary File Types -If the information can be displayed well in HTML, use it! Links to PDF and Word files are frequently unnecessary and inefficient.
  • No Policies – oops. I was just kidding about that first part. Sort of.