“I’m so postmodern I make my muffins out of milkshakes” … so sings Mr8 tonight…

We are teaching our boys to cook. Every Sunday is “Kids in the Kitchen” when they cook dinner. The week before, they plan the meal and work out what ingredients they will need and arrange their shopping list for our weekly grocery shop.  They go to the Farmers’ Markets on Sunday mornings and buy any fresh ingredients they will need. One parent is on cooking duty for the weekend, so works with the kids to plan what they need to do and help them cook it. Bit by bit the kids are making more decisions and doing more meal preparation each time.

Somehow it has evolved into one kid doing the main meal and the other doing dessert.

Mr8 wanted me to blog the recipe for our Milkshake Muffins. We make a fantastic lunchtime banana smoothie that includes dates, sunflower seeds, walnuts, yoghurt and Milo. Two days ago we speculated whether we could use it as the basis of muffins, so tonight was experiment night.

The world’s best muffin recipe book is Esther Brody’s 500 Best Muffin Recipes , so we adapted her Banana Bran Muffins on p.28. Actually only 5 ingredients are the same… All measurements are metric.

Postmodern Milkshake Muffins

Makes 30 – 36 muffins

• 1/2 cup granulated sugar
• 1/2 cup brown sugar
• 1 cup olive oil
• 3 eggs
• 2 TBSP Milo
• 1 1/2 cup mashed banana
• 1 1/2 cup milk
• 1/2 cup plain yoghurt
• 1 1/2 cup instant oats
• 1/2 cup dates unchopped
• 1/2 cup dates chopped
• 1/2 cup walnuts unchopped
• 1/2 cup walnuts chopped
• 1/2 cup sunflower seeds
• 2 cups white plain flour
• 1 cup wholemeal plain flour
• 3 tsp baking powder
• 3 tsp baking soda
• 1 tsp salt

1. Grease three muffin trays
2. Preheat oven to 190 degrees C (350 degrees F)
3. Combine granulated sugar, brown sugar and oil in a bowl.
4. Beat in eggs, one at a time.
5. Use a foodprocessor to combine the 1/2 cup unchopped dates, 1/2 cup unchopped walnuts, banana, milk, yoghurt, sunflower seeds and Milo.
6. Add the milkshake mixture to the egg/sugar mixture.
7. Add the oats
8. In another bowl combine the flour, baking powder, baking soda and salt. Add to the banana mixture; stir until ingredients are just mixed. Do not overmix. Fold in chopped dates and walnuts.
9. Spoon batter into prepared muffin tin, filling to the top.
10. Bake in preheated oven for 15 to 20 minutes.

The “Postmodern” in the title comes courtesy of Amanda Palmer and Neil Gaiman programming Rage on ABCTV today and playing the Bedroom Philosopher’s I’m So Postmodern this morning. It is a little odd to hear our two boys running about the house singing “I’m So Postmodern …”:

Post number 12 for #blogjune 2011

If you have a spare moment, check out the work of Dave Gray.

Did you know 4.0

Dave harnesses his talent for visual thinking to creatively approach familiar problems and concepts in new ways. He founded a company called XPLANE. If the name sounds familiar, they are behind this movie about statistics around media convergence – you know, the one that tells you that there are 2 million TV sets in bathrooms in the USA:

Did You Know 4.0. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ILQrUrEWe8

Gamestorming

You may have heard people raving about his latest book, Gamestorming: a playbook for innovators, rulebreakers and changemakers , co-written with Sunni Brown and James Macanufo. It details a number of thinking games to use with large groups of people to clarify ideas and find solutions. For anyone who has worked with improv theatre or even had any kind of hippy-ish grassroots organisation involvement, many of the techniques will be very familiar. The “button” exercise, for example is just an updating of the “talking stick” idea. There is a lot of sticking postit notes on butchers paper on walls like people sometimes do when deciding topics at the start of an unconference. The analysis of the types of thinking at the start is interesting. Do you want to narrow down ideas (convergent thinking) or generate lots more (divergent thinking)? Do you want to find consensus? Do you want to find relationships between ideas? Group like ideas and concepts to create nodes in a system? There is even a four page guide to drawing people at the start, as many of the exercises involve drawings to get people thinking or in response to ideas – and if you are communicating with people, then you will be drawing people..

It looks to be aimed at rather staid and traditional organisations, with a “look, you can fire up your workers just like those wacky kids at Google!” sort of delivery, but with serious business language and examples. It has hit its target market well and, from the regular search I have set up on the word #gamestorming on Twitter,  groups of people seem to be enjoying using the techniques in it.

The book is definitely worth reading and I would LOVE to get use some of the techniques with a group of librarians who want to stem the ebook menace / have free information literacy for all / easily expose as much as their local content as possible / collectively create a super professional development series / make our funding bodies increase our budgets by 10% / work out how to work best with museums and galleries and broadcasters / take over the world – or whatever else a whole bunch of smart and motivated librarians are capable of doing when they unleash their energy and superpowers in a channeled way…

Q-Tools

If Gamestorming sounds a little too involved, if you at all work in any kind of library, you should check out Dave’s post,Q-tools: An approach for discovery and knowledge work. It looks at different ways of classifying and refining questions. It is almost upside-down from the traditional approach of libraries, where we created taxonomies and classification schema for our “just in case” collections that were aimed at organising our potential answers.

The post looks at ways to create more effective questions in a world of indexed full-text and keyword-searchable “just in time” information online. This is like a taxonomy to use to classify and analyse the question you use to filter the information. The analysis is by methodology, how you want the answer sorted and refined technically – rather than the traditional “reference interview” types of questions that focus more on refining the subject and purpose of an information enquiry aimed at a single solution.

Here are his different types of questions. It is worth looking at the longer explanations and diagrams in the post.

1. A prism is a question that divides information into smaller groups.
2. A razor is a question that divides information into two categories, based on relevance.
3. A generator is a question that has a potentially unlimited number of answers.
4. A peeler is a single question that, when repeated, drives attention to deeper and deeper levels, like the peeling of an onion.
5. A flanker is a question that seeks patterns or ideas that are similar. The purpose of a flanker is to think laterally and find an analogous situation that may help you think about things differently.
6. A splicer is a question that combines information, or sets, into groups. The purpose of a splicer is to find larger categories and simplify collections of information.
7. A pointer is a question that has a well-defined or broadly agreed-upon answer, or set of answers. The purpose of a pointer is to gather specific information, for example: “What is your name?”

Post number 11 for #blogjune 2011

Please tell me – What are you doing well professionally or in your library ?

This post was started on Thursday and finished on Friday, so I will count it as a post for both days 🙂

This one was inspired by Teresa Bennet’s  post about Sparkling with Confidence and by Jeff Cruz’ post today on the ALIA Sydney blog , Open Access vs. Cultural Protocols: Indigenous Knowledge Management …. so inspiring in fact that instead of going straight to sleep after turning in for the night, I have fired up my laptop while snuggling under the covers.

Teresa went to an event last week where Rachel Green was a guest speaker. One of her takeaways was that by sharing our strengths we can contribute, so doing this is not negative or boasting…and then today…

Jeff discussed the protocols around access to indigenous knowledge and looked at how curation agencies can sensitively respect this with their digitized information – arguing that indiscriminate Open Access to information applied without cultural sensitivity is not useful. I don’t think anyone would disagree. I also do not think that Open Access ever meant Open Slather …

It is a very useful discussion – made even more useful for something that is happening in my workplace by the mention of the Mukurtu project . This is a method for providing tiered access to indigenous information according to who is enquiring and whether they have a cultural right to access the information. It provides both a metadata schema to store information about the cultural status of  a digital object, as well as rights of access. It will be downloadable for people who want to tinker with it in Spring 2011 , but I can see from the site that it looks like basically a Drupal installation with a particular set of plugins and pre-configuration… which makes it both very flexible and very easy to adapt and use…

As I sent a link to this to someone else who may be interested, it occurred to me that I only found out about this due to the #blogjune project. The post only existed due to #blogjune. What we have is not only a bunch of librarians blogging about their cats and food and things that scare them, but an outburst of professional conversation as well … Already there have been some excellent professional posts on the Sydney ALIA blog – props to Katrina and co. for arranging this – but also:

• Sophie has shared about Mobile Learning and the Future of Information Literacy
• Kate in Brisbane about how she is using Buddypress in her teaching ,
• Kate in Melbourne has shared her handout for the Free Online Tools workshop she taught
• Michael has shared how he shelves the graphic novels in his libary collection by title instead of author
• Penny has shared a prezi about elearning in her library (what I liked about this one is that it was aimed at senior managment, so it gave a nice example of how to sell our services as well …)

I know that everyone does not have a cool prezi up their sleeves … but I would like to know, would love to hear more library bloggers sharing their strengths – boasting even, I don’t mind. I will bet that something that you do well professionally that you think is rather ordinary actually would be mindblowing to other library folk.

I am constantly impressed when I go to conferences at the everyday projects that libraries are doing, but often we do not get to hear about. One of the most memorable was from a couple of librarians at Batchelor College in Darwin talking about how they “non project managed” the transformation of a cluttered space into a flexible and culturally sensitive learning space. I am not necessarily thinking of clever Library Week events – it could be something very simple.

BAH-BOW!

I’ll start. I should leave this tomorrow, but it is a really simple thing. When I was at the Grove, we had self-checkout PCs that used to make an high pitched alert sound when a user did something wrong like try to issue an item already on loan to someone else. People constantly ignored it and staff were not wonderful at hearing the sound either. At a staff meeting after brainstorming, we decided to try the “wrong answer” noise from the old game show, Family Feud. Luckily the Bah-Bow! sound could be downloaded from the Internet Archive , so we did so, made that the new alert sound for the self check units and suddenly users were paying attention when the selfcheck needed their attention…

… so #blogjune bloggers, what is a strength that you have professionally or do well in your library?

Post number 9 and 10 for #blogjune 2011

 

 

I couldn’t post about having a sick cat without posting an update when I knew more.

Over the weekend Nougat perked up a bit and was less lethargic, which means that she was even wobblier as she tried to do more. She was eating like a horse – which she usually does to create extra body-heat to compensate for having so little fur.

Nougat had an anaesthetic and a full body x-ray yesterday. There was nothing nasty found in her spine or hips. Her right inner-ear however is full of yukky stuff that showed up on the x-ray as a white swollen mass behind her eardrum. This is sort of good news, as when there is not an obvious problem in one side like an ear infection, this kind of balance loss is usually caused by something central – often a brain tumour.

The treatment is either very strong drugs or getting the eardrum punctured by a specialist who then taks a biopsy and cleans out the yuck. She has been sick on and off with this for eight months – so sick that we did not think she would get through it twice –  so we are going to give her time to recover and then probably go for the operation.

She had a couple of old-cat skin lesions removed at the same time as the x-ray, so has 16 stitches at the moment – eight under her right foreleg and eight just above her tail on her back. We have three different medications to give her – one liquid that must be taken with food once a day, a pill twice a day and another liquid that we gave her for the first time when she returned from the vet. We have another ten days of this one, which has the side-effect of making her foam at the mouth and call up her Cat Mafia friends to take out a contract on her owners…. We also have to wash out her ear with a special ear wash for the next 10 days.

Thanks to modern veterinary science, as well as a showbag of medications, we also took home a CD with Nougat’s x-rays on it… not sure how I feel about that…in fact I feel almost like I am invading her privacy by putting the image above here…

We just need to get her through the next few days without splitting her stitches or splattering herself on the tiles. She has already tried to jump up on to a desk, missed her footing and landed flat on her back right where her stitches are. Luckily someone will be with her for the rest of the week. I do not think she will enjoy the collar of shame that the vet gave us for her to wear when noone else is around.

Post number 8 for #blogjune 2011

I saw a tweet yesterday asking how people with kids manage to get anything done.

The answer in my case – “with compromise on how I do almost everything and feeling very tired much of the time”.

This is one of the reasons I do not blog every day. Some days – most days – that is about as much as I can come up with in the insightful and/or interesting department.

There is no rule that says that this blogging space needs to be positive and interesting…except…except.. that is how I mainly want it to be.

I spend a lot of time researching most posts, providing links to follow for further information. About twice a month over the last five years I have looked back to my blog to confirm a factette or find the name of some useful tool that I wanted to use. The CoverItLive sessions that I put here have been very useful to me to follow up something that I did not have time to think about at the time of the event. I want this space to be useful in that way.

I want this space to be somewhere that I feel OK revisiting and as a record of my thoughts, much more than a record of how I am feeling or what I am doing generally. I definitely don’t want a whole bunch of posts with a light touch and positive spin that do not really reflect where my mind is at the moment – just for the sake of writing every day.

… And there is the challenge with this #blogjune exercise. I cannot daily write the types of posts that I usually like to write. It takes more time than I have. I feel like I am diluting my usual blogging style and my blog. If I am spending my time feeling tired and like I am pulled in one thousand directions, I don’t really want to write about it here. I already KNOW that this is how it feels for me much of the time. I am sure that most other people do too. Some days though – most days – that’s all I’ve got.

Post number 7 in #blogjune

After two semesters of being a unit coordinator at university, I am sharing secret insider knowledge about how to pass the units I teach.

1. Read the unit outline
2. Clarify what you do not understand
3. Do what the unit outline says, when it says to do it

And here is the secret how to do very well in the units I teach:

1. Read the unit outline
2. Clarify what you do not understand – and support classmates
3. Do what the unit outline says to a high standard, when it says to do it

I am seeing three kinds of students:

1. Clever, organised students. They do very well.
2. Not so clever, organised students. They pass.
3. Clever, disorganised students. Some pass, barely. Most do not.

Students in the last category are hard to watch as they make their way through semester. I am learning to be much, much clearer with expectations – even to the extent of pedantic silliness, spelling out requirements in a way that must make students in the first two categories want to say “duh! – please don’t patronise us”.

It is so hard to balance fairness to all students. There are students who without making any fuss spend their time ensuring that they are within word limits, learn how to reference correctly, write in a scholarly manner, answer what a question asks in the way it asks for, ask if they need an extension before an assignment is due, demonstrate that they have read the required readings and offer support to their fellow students. I want to honour their efforts and take their efforts as seriously as they do. I also want to be kind to everyone.

Some of the hardest students to watch are those who are disorganised because they have too much else going on in their lives. I know that divorces, health issues, having to work to eat and supporting family members in crisis can affect studies. I also know that there are students who withdraw or do not take up studies when these things are going on in their lives because they accept that they could not study well.

I think it takes more than two semesters to get the right balance of fairness and kindness. I wonder, also, if it is possible at all…

But, the three steps to pass at the start of this post? I know that they do work…

Post number 6 for #blogjune 2011

… splendiferous remix …

Library Hack

Entries for the LibraryHack competition to remix data from Australian libraries have now closed. You can see them all on the Libraryhack Entries page . Prizes are announced 24 June.

I have two favourites so far.

1) The glorious image viewer is a physical installation that consists of three cylinders that rotate, displaying projected images from the library’s collection. This little movie tells you more about it: 3D Interactive projection image viewer .

2) Convictbook that displays using a Facebook-like interface information and photos of over 100 000 convicts from the State Library of Queensland’s Convict Transfer Register. The link above is to the entry page at LibraryHack, but you can see Convictbook  live here: Convictbook

Post number 4 for #blogjune 2011

As of today, YouTube will give users the ability to indicate during upload that they have licensed their movies under an Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0) license.  Before now, the only way you could indicate that you were releasing under a Creative Commons license was to add an note to the credits.

There will be just one type of license that you can choose, although there are many other types of Creative Commons License available. This CC Licence means that you are allowing others to reuse your content as long as they give you credit in the way that is specified on the YouTube site. So people will be able to use your content for commercial gains and  to remix it however they want.

Further, the YouTube Editor has been altered to allow you to edit more than just your own videos.  You can now search for any items that have a Creative Commons license and reuse and remix them.

With only two licenses to choose from at upload, I wonder how this affects people who (like me) prefer to use another type of Creative Commons License? Following the link to the generic YouTube license, it says:

…you retain all of your ownership rights in your Content. However, by submitting Content to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, publish, adapt, make available online or electronically transmit, and perform the Content in connection with the Service and YouTube’s (and its successors’ and affiliates’) business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Service (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels. You also hereby grant each user of the Service a non-exclusive license to access your Content through the Service, and to use, reproduce, distribute, display, publish, make available online or electronically transmit, and perform such Content as permitted through the functionality of the Service and under these Terms of Service. The above licenses granted by you in video Content you submit to the Service terminate within a commercially reasonable time after you remove or delete your videos from the Service. You understand and agree, however, that YouTube may retain, but not display, distribute, or perform, server copies of your videos that have been removed or deleted. The above licenses granted by you in user comments you submit are perpetual and irrevocable.

So – I am guessing that I can either:

1. Keep my copyright and grant YouTube a license to reuse
2. Keep my copyright and grant YouTube a license to reuse PLUS add my own Creative Commons Licence via the credits so people do not have to contact me to get permission for the reuse I specify
3. License as a Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0)

More information is available on the YouTube Creative Commons page.

Post number 3 for #blogjune 2011

Imagine you are getting ready to shower before work. Looking down you see something very ordinary like this:

 

Within a minute, however, growing across your field of vision begins a flashing, zigzagging shape .  It covers most of the visual field, and over the next twenty minutes or so, it will drift toward the left side. About 15 minutes in, another one will appear in the centre, pushing the first one further left. It shimmies and moves about slightly.You cannot really look at it directly and it does not really obscure anything.

You feel your body go rather weak and you space out a little – words come, but they are slowly formed and very deliberate. By now you are concentrating on your breathing and trying to breathe evenly and slowly without hyperventilating. It is difficult – there is this freakish flashing thing dominating your vision.

 

Shut one eye and it is still there. Look through that one with the other shut and the flashing thing stays. Even closing your eyes does not block it out. It just superimposes itself in colour against the darkness. It is like someone yelling loudly in your ear nonstop and not being able to turn your head away.

As it gets more intense and goes for longer than it ever has before, you phone the government help line, Healthdirect. With it getting worse, you decide to go to the hospital emergency department 10 minutes away. While dressing for this, you look up and notice that the aura has vanished – like a distant lawnmower cutting out without you noticing exactly when the sound stopped.

Not out of the woods yet though. When you look at the faces of your family, just the faces, they seem wrong. Almost like Picasso’s Weeping Woman. When you look closer and try to quantify or calibrate where the distortion is, each bit looks normal – but taken together the face just looks wrong. That only lasts for about 5 minutes.

That’s what happened to me this morning. The Emergency Department confirmed my G.P’s diagnosis – Migraine Aura or Visual Aura . Often people who get migraines have this kind of visual disturbance. It seems like I get the visual disturbance, feel weak and kind of spaced-out for a day, but do not get the terrible headache.

The first time it happened was after a parent died and the second time was  in the weeks after giving birth, 8 years ago.  It has not happened since. I was so glad to know the probable cause this morning, as the first couple of times was very, very scary. It is still scary , but knowing that I was neither having a stroke, about to have an epileptic fit nor going plain crazy was comforting. The facial metamorphosia was new, but maybe it was there before and I only noticed it this time.

Post number 2 for #blogjune 2011