{"id":91,"date":"2006-11-26T21:45:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-27T04:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/keep-library20-in-wikipedia\/"},"modified":"2006-11-26T21:45:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-27T04:45:00","slug":"keep-library20-in-wikipedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/2006\/11\/26\/keep-library20-in-wikipedia\/","title":{"rendered":"Keep &#8220;Library2.0&#8221; in Wikipedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #6600cc\"><\/span><span style=\"font-family: arial\">There is a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Library_2.0\">proposal currently for discussion <\/a>on <a href=\"http:\/\/wikipedia.org\">Wikipedia<\/a> that the entry for  &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Library_2.0\">Library 2.0<\/a>&#8221; be deleted from Wikipedia.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Initial proposal says that it is&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote \/><p>&#8220;A neologism coined by a blogger and used by bloggers, not notable <a title=\"User:Lurker\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Lurker\"><span style=\"background-color: lightblue; color: black\">Lurker<\/span><\/a> &#8221;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #6600cc; font-family: arial\">The people I&#8217;d expect have jumped in and defended it, using the arguments I&#8217;d expect. They cite legitimate academic articles to show how the term has escaped the bilbioblogosphere. It is now being used by librarians who have never read a blog in their lives, to describe a change in our profession.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>In itself, it&#8217;s an interesting debate about the &#8220;Library 2.0&#8221; concept &#8230;is it just the &#8220;2.0&#8221; label whacked on the end of another concept, to form a buzzword&#8230;or is it a shorthand to describe a new way of serving our clients?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m also enjoying learning about how Wikipedia works as a living, breathing &#8220;debate&#8221; and reflecting about what this means for &#8220;set truths&#8221; found in an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I don&#8217;t remember any entry in my print version of<span style=\"font-style: italic\"> Encyclopedia Britannica <\/span>changing from one reading to the next. Does this lead to more or less certainty about the veracity of the facts?<\/p>\n<p>I was <a href=\"http:\/\/librariansmatter.blogspot.com\/2006\/09\/steve-irwin-visiting-his-zoo-and_07.html\">just as fascinated <\/a>watching the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Steve_Irwin\">discussion&#8221; page<\/a> for <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Steve_Irwin\">Steve Irwin<\/a>&#8216;s entry immediately after his death.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #6600cc\"><\/span><span style=\"font-family: arial\">found via <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.talis.com\/panlibus\/archives\/2006\/11\/should_we_delet.php\">Panlibus<\/a>&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #6600cc\"><\/span><span style=\"font-family: arial\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #6600cc; font-family: arial\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #6600cc\">TODAY&#8217;S <\/span><a style=\"color: #3333ff\" href=\"http:\/\/librariansmatter.blogspot.com\/2006\/10\/technological-fads-fridges-and-hippie.html\">HIPPIE CARD<\/a><span style=\"color: #6600cc\">: Wake Up<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #6600cc\"><\/span><span style=\"font-family: arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"blogger-post-footer\">Imported from the earlier version of my blog that used Blogger. Commenter&#8217;s email and URLS will not show up.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is a proposal currently for discussion on Wikipedia that the entry for &#8220;Library 2.0&#8221; be deleted from Wikipedia. Initial proposal says that it is&#8230; &#8220;A neologism coined by a blogger and used by bloggers, not notable Lurker &#8221; The people I&#8217;d expect have jumped in and defended it, using the arguments I&#8217;d expect. They&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[218,432],"class_list":["post-91","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-library20","tag-wikipedia"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3BXdd-1t","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/librariansmatter.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}