Comments on: Britannica wants our links http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2008/04/22/britannica-wants-our-links/ It is and we do. Musing, enthusing, libraries, emerging technologies, balancing, being mum. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:43:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tom Panelas http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2008/04/22/britannica-wants-our-links/comment-page-1/#comment-37211 Tom Panelas Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:59:29 +0000 http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2008/04/22/britannica-wants-our-links/#comment-37211 Dear Kathryn, Thanks for your observations. Of course, you're still entirely welcome to claim your free subscription, even if the linking part of Britannica's program irritates you. :o) Best, Tom (@ Britannica) Dear Kathryn,

Thanks for your observations. Of course, you’re still entirely welcome to claim your free subscription, even if the linking part of Britannica’s program irritates you. :o )

Best,
Tom (@ Britannica)

]]> By: Digital content for free! (semi-free) (or something) « info-fetishist http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2008/04/22/britannica-wants-our-links/comment-page-1/#comment-37189 Digital content for free! (semi-free) (or something) « info-fetishist Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:36:13 +0000 http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2008/04/22/britannica-wants-our-links/#comment-37189 [...] have a price tag.  Now, one reason for this is clear - as Kathryn Greenhill has already explained - Britannica wants more links because more links = more better in a Google-dominated [...] [...] have a price tag.  Now, one reason for this is clear – as Kathryn Greenhill has already explained – Britannica wants more links because more links = more better in a Google-dominated [...]

]]>