<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LINTerviews are fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/</link>
	<description>It is and we do. Musing, enthusing, libraries, emerging technologies, balancing, being mum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Greenhill</title>
		<link>http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-2750</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Greenhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/#comment-2750</guid>
		<description>Thanks Maeve. I saw the other answers and thought I may have been flippant, but I couldn&#039;t think of anything more to write.

Hmmm...if I was Hamlet, I&#039;d probably mean &quot;hoist&quot;, but nowadays I think hoisted is accepted - although via the mutation of language, not correct usage. Next time I&#039;ll use hoist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Maeve. I saw the other answers and thought I may have been flippant, but I couldn&#8217;t think of anything more to write.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;if I was Hamlet, I&#8217;d probably mean &#8220;hoist&#8221;, but nowadays I think hoisted is accepted &#8211; although via the mutation of language, not correct usage. Next time I&#8217;ll use hoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maeve</title>
		<link>http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-2729</link>
		<dc:creator>Maeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 07:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/#comment-2729</guid>
		<description>Kathryn, your short answers were more real and entertaining than the long, laboriously thought out replies given by others.

Don&#039;t you mean &quot;hoist (not hoisted) by my own petard&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn, your short answers were more real and entertaining than the long, laboriously thought out replies given by others.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you mean &#8220;hoist (not hoisted) by my own petard&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Greenhill</title>
		<link>http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Greenhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 14:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>Yep..see. First time you comment on one of my posts, it&#039;s one that I didn&#039;t have to do much thinking or philosophising about.  I think you partly right - it&#039;s the raw emotional nature, but also that those &quot;low effort, high comment posts aren&#039;t overthought and made heavy by extra frills.
I&#039;m really learning from Twitter that people can often sensibly post in just 140 characters what they may have put in a five paragraph blog post before. And their personality still manages to shine through in those 140 character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep..see. First time you comment on one of my posts, it&#8217;s one that I didn&#8217;t have to do much thinking or philosophising about.  I think you partly right &#8211; it&#8217;s the raw emotional nature, but also that those &#8220;low effort, high comment posts aren&#8217;t overthought and made heavy by extra frills.<br />
I&#8217;m really learning from Twitter that people can often sensibly post in just 140 characters what they may have put in a five paragraph blog post before. And their personality still manages to shine through in those 140 character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Barber</title>
		<link>http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 13:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/05/20/linterviews-are-fun/#comment-2699</guid>
		<description>Kathryn - Love the answer to the last question
 
...When I write a carefully thought out or a totally contentious post, hardly anyone comments….but when I do a throw away post that takes hardly any effort - everyone comments on that one. 

This is just so true. You slave over the post, no one appears to care, you do it in a rush, and its hit..  Maybe its the raw emotional nature of the latter, I don&#039;t have the answer either. 

Nice idea the question meme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn &#8211; Love the answer to the last question</p>
<p>&#8230;When I write a carefully thought out or a totally contentious post, hardly anyone comments….but when I do a throw away post that takes hardly any effort &#8211; everyone comments on that one. </p>
<p>This is just so true. You slave over the post, no one appears to care, you do it in a rush, and its hit..  Maybe its the raw emotional nature of the latter, I don&#8217;t have the answer either. </p>
<p>Nice idea the question meme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

