Comments on: Define:slooced http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/02/19/defineslooced/ It is and we do. Musing, enthusing, libraries, emerging technologies, balancing, being mum. Mon, 21 May 2012 01:52:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Kathryn Greenhill http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/02/19/defineslooced/comment-page-1/#comment-379 Kathryn Greenhill Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:20:59 +0000 http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/02/19/defineslooced/#comment-379 Thanks Andrew. I think Rochelle's comment on the post is interesting too - it can be a matter of priorities for your clients as well. I like her comment that for her library "It’s not a fit with our community, we don’t have the time, and we are more than happy to let others bring up and nurture this baby before we bring it to our bosom". Thanks Andrew. I think Rochelle’s comment on the post is interesting too – it can be a matter of priorities for your clients as well.

I like her comment that for her library “It’s not a fit with our community, we don’t have the time, and we are more than happy to let others bring up and nurture this baby before we bring it to our bosom”.

]]> By: Andrew http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/02/19/defineslooced/comment-page-1/#comment-372 Andrew Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:02:27 +0000 http://librariansmatter.com/blog/2007/02/19/defineslooced/#comment-372 On a slightly related note, <a href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/02/18/second-life-vs-pat-conroy-the-e-book-long-tail-and-good-parenting/" rel="nofollow">this</a> was recently posted on Library Stuff... I had a brief read of the <a href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6203" rel="nofollow">linked article</a>, and it's all striking me as being very judgemental and I guess my biggest objection is where the author, in his almost-final words, sets up a very incorrect false-dichotomy of "information literacy" (his quotation marks) vs. books. *sigh* On a slightly related note, this was recently posted on Library Stuff…

I had a brief read of the linked article, and it’s all striking me as being very judgemental and I guess my biggest objection is where the author, in his almost-final words, sets up a very incorrect false-dichotomy of “information literacy” (his quotation marks) vs. books.

*sigh*

]]>